Hibiscus rosa-sinensis acoustic regulation against vehicular noise in Iquitos, Peru
Regulación acústica de Hibiscus rosa-sinensis frente al ruido vehicular en Iquitos, PerúMain Article Content
Context: Introduction: urban vehicular noise significantly impacts environmental quality, necessitating green infrastructure solutions. Objective: to quantify the effectiveness of Hibiscus rosa-sinensis L. barriers in reducing vehicular noise along La Marina Avenue in Iquitos, Peru. Methods: the study adopted a quantitative, cross-sectional, and comparative design, focusing on continuous H. rosa-sinensis barriers. Purposive sampling was performed at six locations across the EsSalud and Bellavista Nanay sectors. Acoustic measurements utilized a Class 1 integrating sound level meter (IEC 61672-1:2013) following ISO 1996-2:2017 and MINAM protocols. Three conditions were compared: open field, Position A, and Position B. Results: the barriers had a mean height of 1.208 ± 0.066 m and a width of 1.008 ± 0.080 m. The open field LAeq,T was 74.63 ± 2.16 dB(A), exceeding environmental quality standards (ECA) at 100% of the sampling points. Position A showed a significant reduction of 2.90 ± 1.05 dB(A) (U=30.0; p=.033; r=.667), whereas Position B showed no significant difference (p=.120). Conclusion: H. rosa-sinensis provides measurable acoustic regulation; however, its effectiveness is constrained by insufficient barrier height and depth.
Contexto: El ruido vehicular urbano afecta la calidad ambiental y demanda soluciones basadas en infraestructura verde. Objetivo: Cuantificar la efectividad de barreras de Hibiscus rosa-sinensis L. en la reducción del ruido vehicular en la Avenida La Marina, Punchana, Iquitos, Perú. Metodología: Se desarrolló un estudio cuantitativo, aplicado, observacional, transversal y comparativo. La población estuvo constituida por barreras continuas de H. rosa-sinensis ubicadas entre la calzada y las edificaciones colindantes; la muestra fue no probabilística intencional de seis puntos distribuidos en los sectores EsSalud y Bellavista Nanay. Se aplicó observación técnica, medición acústica con sonómetro integrador Clase 1 conforme a IEC 61672-1:2013, calibración acústica IEC 60942:2017, ISO 1996-2:2017 y Protocolo MINAM. Se compararon tres posiciones: campo abierto, posición A y posición B. Resultados: Las barreras presentaron altura media de 1,208 ± 0,066 m y ancho de 1,008 ± 0,080 m. El LAeqT en campo abierto fue 74,63 ± 2,16 dB(A), superando el ECA en el 100 % de puntos. La posición A redujo 2,90 ± 1,05 dB(A), con diferencia significativa (U = 30,0; p = 0,033; r = 0,667), mientras la posición B no fue significativa (p = 0,120). Conclusiones: H. rosa-sinensis ofrece regulación acústica real, aunque limitada por altura y profundidad insuficientes.
Downloads
Article Details
World Health Organization. Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2018. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/279952
Basner M, Babisch W, Davis A, Brink M, Clark C, Janssen S, et al. Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health. Lancet. 2014;383(9925):1325-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61613-X
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2005. https://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf
Karis CM, Mujica CM. Infraestructura ecológica y adaptación urbana al cambio climático: explorando el potencial de los espacios verdes. Bitácora Urbano-Territorial. 2023;33(3):139-52. https://doi.org/10.15446/bitacora.v33n3.109527
Posada I, Arroyave M, Fernández C. Influencia de la vegetación en los niveles de ruido urbano. Rev EIA. 2009;12:79-89. https://www.academia.edu/40974803/Influencia_de_la_vegetaci%C3%B3n_en_los_niveles_de_ruido_urbano
Van Renterghem T, Botteldooren D, Verheyen K. Road traffic noise shielding by vegetation belts of limited depth. J Sound Vib. 2012;331(10):2404-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2012.01.006
Van Renterghem T, Botteldooren D, Verheyen K. Road traffic noise reduction by vegetated low noise barriers in urban streets. Proceedings of Internoise 2012. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234016309_Road_traffic_noise_reduction_by_vegetated_low_noise_barriers_in_urban_streets
Defrance J, Jean P. Integration of the efficiency of noise barrier caps in a 3D ray tracing method. Case of a T-shaped diffracting device. Appl Acoust. 2003;64(8):765-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-682X(03)00034-3
Tyagi V, Kumar K, Jain VK. A study of the spectral characteristics of traffic noise attenuation by vegetation belts in Delhi. Appl Acoust. 2006;67(9):926-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2005.05.008
Pathak V, Tripathi BD, Mishra VK. Dynamics of traffic noise in a tropical city Varanasi and its abatement through vegetation. Environ Monit Assess. 2008;146:67-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-0060-1
Pathak V, Tripathi BD, Mishra VK. Evaluation of anticipated performance index of some tree species for green belt development to mitigate traffic generated noise. Urban For Urban Green. 2011;10(1):61-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2010.06.006
Lu J, Xiao Y, Shao Y. Research on the comprehensive noise reduction effectiveness of plant communities in urban green spaces. Landsc Archit Front. 2025;13(1):76-91. https://doi.org/10.15302/J-LAF-0-020027
Fiedler PEK, Zannin PHT. Evaluation of noise pollution in urban traffic hubs—Noise maps and measurements. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2015;51:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2014.09.014
Hernández-Ocampo RV, Chuncho-Morocho CG, García-Matailo SR, León-Celi CF, Castillo-Villalta JA. Situación actual y predicción del ruido vehicular en la zona urbana de la ciudad de Loja (Ecuador). Cedamaz. 2021;11(2):99-106. https://doi.org/10.54753/cedamaz.v11i2.1177
Gonzales Sucasaire NE. Data analysis of vehicular noise pollution and its perception in the cities of Juliaca and Puno, Puno region – 2021. Data Metadata. 2023;2:44. https://doi.org/10.56294/dm202344
Marin-Mamani G, Marín-Paucara E, Bolívar-Espinoza N, Enriquez-Mamani V, Curro-Pérez F. Modelamiento Kriging del comportamiento vertical de ruido ambiental mediante mapas temáticos durante festividades culturales en Puno y Juliaca, Perú. Tecnol Marcha. 2021;34(3):3-14. https://doi.org/10.18845/tm.v34i3.4989
Flores Flores LA, Seclén Medina A, Bardales Grández KM, Ramírez Álvarez KE, Alva Chirinos ME. Caracterización y mapeo del ruido ambiental en el casco urbano de Pebas, Loreto, Perú. Rev Alfa. 2025;9(25):22-37. https://doi.org/10.33996/revistaalfa.v9i25.329
Flores Flores LA. Evaluación del riesgo ambiental por ruido en la avenida Participación, Iquitos, Perú. Cienc Amaz (Iquitos). 2023;11(1-2):1-16. https://doi.org/10.22386/ca.v11i1-2.382
Presidencia del Consejo de Ministros. Decreto Supremo N.° 085-2003-PCM, Reglamento de Estándares Nacionales de Calidad Ambiental para Ruido. Lima: PCM; 2003. https://www.gob.pe/institucion/pcm/normas-legales/3115975-085-2003-pcm
Ow LF, Ghosh S. Urban cities and road traffic noise: reduction through vegetation. Appl Acoust. 2017;120:15-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.01.011
Van Renterghem T. Towards explaining the positive effect of vegetation on the perception of environmental noise. Urban For Urban Green. 2019;40:133-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.01.015
Gaudon JM, McTavish MJ. Noise attenuation varies by interactions of land cover and season in an urban/peri-urban landscape. Urban Ecosyst. 2022;25(3):811-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-021-01194-4
Tashakor S, Chamani A. Temporal variability of noise pollution attenuation by vegetation in urban parks. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2021;28:23143-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12355-5
Escalona CM, Buot IE. Exploring leaf architecture in varieties of Hibiscus rosa-sinensis L. (Malvaceae). Biodiversitas. 2023;24(10):5432-41. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d241017
Hao Z, Shi L, Ding J, Wang Z, Sun X. Noise was obviously reduced by both leaf texture and surface roughness in leaf scale. Plants. 2024;14(9):1363. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14091363
Ministerio del Ambiente. Protocolo nacional de monitoreo de ruido ambiental, Resolución Ministerial N.° 227-2013-MINAM. Lima: MINAM; 2013. https://www.minam.gob.pe/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/RM-N%C2%BA-227-2013-MINAM.pdf
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 1996-1:2016. Acoustics—Description, measurement and assessment of environmental noise—Part 1: Basic quantities and assessment procedures. Geneva: ISO; 2016. https://www.iso.org/standard/59765.html
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 1996-2:2017. Acoustics—Description, measurement and assessment of environmental noise—Part 2: Determination of sound pressure levels. Geneva: ISO; 2017. https://www.iso.org/standard/59766.html
International Electrotechnical Commission. IEC 61672-1:2013. Electroacoustics—Sound level meters—Part 1: Specifications. Geneva: IEC; 2013. https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/5708
Takahashi H, Yamada K, Horiuchi R. Physical Quantities of Sound and Expanding Demands for Noise Measurement. Springer, 2023; 1527-1569. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2074-7_85
Prasetiyo I, Sihar I, Rahayu GM, Aziz NA. Sonic crystal green walls based on a combination of cylinder scatterers and vegetation for noise mitigation in urban design. Build Acoust. 2024;31(3):259-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1351010X241272155
Kumar M, Gautam C, Garg N, Snehlata, Rajlaxmi A. Effect of vegetation in abatement of noise pollution: a soundscape approach. En: Garg N, editor. Handbook of Vibroacoustics, Noise and Harshness. Singapore: Springer; 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4638-9_5-1