Main Article Content

Ricardo Israel Guerra Ferreyra
Jessica Estefany Panduro Ríos
Luis Antonio Flores Flores
Karenth Elena Ramírez Álvarez
Maria Enith Alva Chirinos

Context: Introduction: urban vehicular noise significantly impacts environmental quality, necessitating green infrastructure solutions. Objective: to quantify the effectiveness of Hibiscus rosa-sinensis L. barriers in reducing vehicular noise along La Marina Avenue in Iquitos, Peru. Methods: the study adopted a quantitative, cross-sectional, and comparative design, focusing on continuous H. rosa-sinensis barriers. Purposive sampling was performed at six locations across the EsSalud and Bellavista Nanay sectors. Acoustic measurements utilized a Class 1 integrating sound level meter (IEC 61672-1:2013) following ISO 1996-2:2017 and MINAM protocols. Three conditions were compared: open field, Position A, and Position B. Results: the barriers had a mean height of 1.208 ± 0.066 m and a width of 1.008 ± 0.080 m. The open field LAeq,T  was 74.63 ± 2.16 dB(A), exceeding environmental quality standards (ECA) at 100% of the sampling points. Position A showed a significant reduction of 2.90 ± 1.05 dB(A) (U=30.0; p=.033; r=.667), whereas Position B showed no significant difference (p=.120). Conclusion: H. rosa-sinensis provides measurable acoustic regulation; however, its effectiveness is constrained by insufficient barrier height and depth.

Contexto: El ruido vehicular urbano afecta la calidad ambiental y demanda soluciones basadas en infraestructura verde. Objetivo: Cuantificar la efectividad de barreras de Hibiscus rosa-sinensis L. en la reducción del ruido vehicular en la Avenida La Marina, Punchana, Iquitos, Perú. Metodología: Se desarrolló un estudio cuantitativo, aplicado, observacional, transversal y comparativo. La población estuvo constituida por barreras continuas de H. rosa-sinensis ubicadas entre la calzada y las edificaciones colindantes; la muestra fue no probabilística intencional de seis puntos distribuidos en los sectores EsSalud y Bellavista Nanay. Se aplicó observación técnica, medición acústica con sonómetro integrador Clase 1 conforme a IEC 61672-1:2013, calibración acústica IEC 60942:2017, ISO 1996-2:2017 y Protocolo MINAM. Se compararon tres posiciones: campo abierto, posición A y posición B. Resultados: Las barreras presentaron altura media de 1,208 ± 0,066 m y ancho de 1,008 ± 0,080 m. El LAeqT en campo abierto fue 74,63 ± 2,16 dB(A), superando el ECA en el 100 % de puntos. La posición A redujo 2,90 ± 1,05 dB(A), con diferencia significativa (U = 30,0; p = 0,033; r = 0,667), mientras la posición B no fue significativa (p = 0,120). Conclusiones: H. rosa-sinensis ofrece regulación acústica real, aunque limitada por altura y profundidad insuficientes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Guerra Ferreyra RI, Panduro Ríos JE, Flores Flores LA, Ramírez Álvarez KE, Alva Chirinos ME. Hibiscus rosa-sinensis acoustic regulation against vehicular noise in Iquitos, Peru. Alfa Revista de Investigación en Ciencias Agronómicas y Veterinarias. 2026;10(29):1-13. https://doi.org/10.33996/revistaalfa.v10i29.472
Section
RESEARCH ARTICLES
Bookmark and Share
Referencias

World Health Organization. Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2018. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/279952

Basner M, Babisch W, Davis A, Brink M, Clark C, Janssen S, et al. Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health. Lancet. 2014;383(9925):1325-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61613-X

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2005. https://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf

Karis CM, Mujica CM. Infraestructura ecológica y adaptación urbana al cambio climático: explorando el potencial de los espacios verdes. Bitácora Urbano-Territorial. 2023;33(3):139-52. https://doi.org/10.15446/bitacora.v33n3.109527

Posada I, Arroyave M, Fernández C. Influencia de la vegetación en los niveles de ruido urbano. Rev EIA. 2009;12:79-89. https://www.academia.edu/40974803/Influencia_de_la_vegetaci%C3%B3n_en_los_niveles_de_ruido_urbano

Van Renterghem T, Botteldooren D, Verheyen K. Road traffic noise shielding by vegetation belts of limited depth. J Sound Vib. 2012;331(10):2404-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2012.01.006

Van Renterghem T, Botteldooren D, Verheyen K. Road traffic noise reduction by vegetated low noise barriers in urban streets. Proceedings of Internoise 2012. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234016309_Road_traffic_noise_reduction_by_vegetated_low_noise_barriers_in_urban_streets

Defrance J, Jean P. Integration of the efficiency of noise barrier caps in a 3D ray tracing method. Case of a T-shaped diffracting device. Appl Acoust. 2003;64(8):765-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-682X(03)00034-3

Tyagi V, Kumar K, Jain VK. A study of the spectral characteristics of traffic noise attenuation by vegetation belts in Delhi. Appl Acoust. 2006;67(9):926-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2005.05.008

Pathak V, Tripathi BD, Mishra VK. Dynamics of traffic noise in a tropical city Varanasi and its abatement through vegetation. Environ Monit Assess. 2008;146:67-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-0060-1

Pathak V, Tripathi BD, Mishra VK. Evaluation of anticipated performance index of some tree species for green belt development to mitigate traffic generated noise. Urban For Urban Green. 2011;10(1):61-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2010.06.006

Lu J, Xiao Y, Shao Y. Research on the comprehensive noise reduction effectiveness of plant communities in urban green spaces. Landsc Archit Front. 2025;13(1):76-91. https://doi.org/10.15302/J-LAF-0-020027

Fiedler PEK, Zannin PHT. Evaluation of noise pollution in urban traffic hubs—Noise maps and measurements. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2015;51:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2014.09.014

Hernández-Ocampo RV, Chuncho-Morocho CG, García-Matailo SR, León-Celi CF, Castillo-Villalta JA. Situación actual y predicción del ruido vehicular en la zona urbana de la ciudad de Loja (Ecuador). Cedamaz. 2021;11(2):99-106. https://doi.org/10.54753/cedamaz.v11i2.1177

Gonzales Sucasaire NE. Data analysis of vehicular noise pollution and its perception in the cities of Juliaca and Puno, Puno region – 2021. Data Metadata. 2023;2:44. https://doi.org/10.56294/dm202344

Marin-Mamani G, Marín-Paucara E, Bolívar-Espinoza N, Enriquez-Mamani V, Curro-Pérez F. Modelamiento Kriging del comportamiento vertical de ruido ambiental mediante mapas temáticos durante festividades culturales en Puno y Juliaca, Perú. Tecnol Marcha. 2021;34(3):3-14. https://doi.org/10.18845/tm.v34i3.4989

Flores Flores LA, Seclén Medina A, Bardales Grández KM, Ramírez Álvarez KE, Alva Chirinos ME. Caracterización y mapeo del ruido ambiental en el casco urbano de Pebas, Loreto, Perú. Rev Alfa. 2025;9(25):22-37. https://doi.org/10.33996/revistaalfa.v9i25.329

Flores Flores LA. Evaluación del riesgo ambiental por ruido en la avenida Participación, Iquitos, Perú. Cienc Amaz (Iquitos). 2023;11(1-2):1-16. https://doi.org/10.22386/ca.v11i1-2.382

Presidencia del Consejo de Ministros. Decreto Supremo N.° 085-2003-PCM, Reglamento de Estándares Nacionales de Calidad Ambiental para Ruido. Lima: PCM; 2003. https://www.gob.pe/institucion/pcm/normas-legales/3115975-085-2003-pcm

Ow LF, Ghosh S. Urban cities and road traffic noise: reduction through vegetation. Appl Acoust. 2017;120:15-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.01.011

Van Renterghem T. Towards explaining the positive effect of vegetation on the perception of environmental noise. Urban For Urban Green. 2019;40:133-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.01.015

Gaudon JM, McTavish MJ. Noise attenuation varies by interactions of land cover and season in an urban/peri-urban landscape. Urban Ecosyst. 2022;25(3):811-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-021-01194-4

Tashakor S, Chamani A. Temporal variability of noise pollution attenuation by vegetation in urban parks. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2021;28:23143-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12355-5

Escalona CM, Buot IE. Exploring leaf architecture in varieties of Hibiscus rosa-sinensis L. (Malvaceae). Biodiversitas. 2023;24(10):5432-41. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d241017

Hao Z, Shi L, Ding J, Wang Z, Sun X. Noise was obviously reduced by both leaf texture and surface roughness in leaf scale. Plants. 2024;14(9):1363. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14091363

Ministerio del Ambiente. Protocolo nacional de monitoreo de ruido ambiental, Resolución Ministerial N.° 227-2013-MINAM. Lima: MINAM; 2013. https://www.minam.gob.pe/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/RM-N%C2%BA-227-2013-MINAM.pdf

International Organization for Standardization. ISO 1996-1:2016. Acoustics—Description, measurement and assessment of environmental noise—Part 1: Basic quantities and assessment procedures. Geneva: ISO; 2016. https://www.iso.org/standard/59765.html

International Organization for Standardization. ISO 1996-2:2017. Acoustics—Description, measurement and assessment of environmental noise—Part 2: Determination of sound pressure levels. Geneva: ISO; 2017. https://www.iso.org/standard/59766.html

International Electrotechnical Commission. IEC 61672-1:2013. Electroacoustics—Sound level meters—Part 1: Specifications. Geneva: IEC; 2013. https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/5708

Takahashi H, Yamada K, Horiuchi R. Physical Quantities of Sound and Expanding Demands for Noise Measurement. Springer, 2023; 1527-1569. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2074-7_85

Prasetiyo I, Sihar I, Rahayu GM, Aziz NA. Sonic crystal green walls based on a combination of cylinder scatterers and vegetation for noise mitigation in urban design. Build Acoust. 2024;31(3):259-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1351010X241272155

Kumar M, Gautam C, Garg N, Snehlata, Rajlaxmi A. Effect of vegetation in abatement of noise pollution: a soundscape approach. En: Garg N, editor. Handbook of Vibroacoustics, Noise and Harshness. Singapore: Springer; 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4638-9_5-1